DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
an4.& SOURTHOUSF RO SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NR04426-14
15 October 2014
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Tow Secretary of the Navy
Ret: (a) Title 10 U.s.c. 1552
Sub}:
Encl: (1) Db Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 8112/0274
of 28 Aug 2014
1. -Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that
the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner
was advanced to H-6/YNi from the February 2013 Navy-wide Reserve
advancement exam.
2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Vogt, Mr. Ruskin, and Ms. Bianchi
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7
October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing lew and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s.
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit
and warrants, favorable action.
Docket NMo.NRO4426-14
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows: ee
* ¥
a. Petitioner was advanced to H-6/YN1 from the February
2013 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam with an effective date
of 16 December 2013 and a Time In Rate date of 1 duly 2013.
b. Petitioner is authorized all back pay and allowances
from the effective date to present.
Note: Her March 2014 Navy-wide advancement exam {cycle 223) is
hereby invalidated; however, her rank of B-6/YN1L still remains
effective while in Full-Time Support.
c, A copy of this Report of proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c} of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Boara’s
proceedings in the above entitled eT fy
B. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
Docket No. NRG4426-14
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
15 October 2014 .
ROBERT JT. O'NEDTLL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5995 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO5995-14 5 December 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: (REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Qari Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner advanced to....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4497 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, with this Board requesting, in effect, that record be corrected to show that he was from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement filed enclosure (1) the applicable naval advanced to E-5/FC2 cycle. NRO4497-14 CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in Light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. S. Pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2970 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that her Performance Mark Average (PMA) for the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle 212 should have been 3.8 vice 3.7. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5315 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7071S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to grade his March .2014 Navy-wide advancement exam to his-September 2013 missed exam cycle. The Board, consisting ¢ ny reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3893 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to 5 advanced to B-5/MM2 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement | evele. Navy Personnel Command is directed to issue Petitioner a DD Form 215 to correct his effective date of rank and pay. 7, Bi Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1177 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he had one additional award point that should have been added to the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2774 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY aorcAatT WP IAL meomAomc BUARU FOR CORRLY! Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-4/HM3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement cycle vice September 2015 advancement cycle. Docket No.NRO2774-14 CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8251 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to &-4/LS3 from the September 2013 Navy -wide advancement examination cycle. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Vogt, and Ms. Bianchi reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2783 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to CTR2/E5 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2740 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...